LEGO artist Nathan Sawaya

It's been very well established here that we are big time LEGO fanatics and I don't think you can really claim to be a true fan if you aren't familiar with Nathan Sawaya's incredible work. We own this book and have previously reviewed it here. We love to study his LEGO creations. They are truly works of art!

Here's more information from Nathan's official website:


Nathan Sawaya delights adults and children alike with his bright, blocky sculptures made entirely out of LEGO bricks. He rediscovered this quintessential childhood toy after experimenting with a range of mediums, and has been working with it exclusively since the early 2000s. His painstakingly constructed forms encompass such everyday objects as umbrellas and pencils; animals, insects, and natural phenomena; portraits of celebrities; and human figures that serve as ciphers for his emotions. Among the largest of his works is a 20-foot-long Tyrannosaurus Rex skeleton, included in “The Art of the Brick,” a traveling exhibition of his work. Sawaya’s approach is uniquely democratic, as he explains: “I use the same LEGO bricks that you can buy in toy stores. […] If you get inspired to make your own creation, you too can go use the exact same bricks that I use.”

American, b. 1973, Colville, Washington, based in New York, New York

You can browse through his online gallery here and see some of his incredible masterpieces.

Be sure to head on over to his gallery to see a more complete listing of his art.

Thanks for the inspiration Mr. Sawaya!

Time Wounds All Heels: An Agony of Disney's Modern Moviemaking.

I'm pleased to share an editorial about Disney's focus on live action movies written by the one and only Alex!

In 2010, Tim Burton got it in his head to take his mental stylings to an old English tale, that of Alice in Wonderland. Disney had tried and failed first time round, as had many others, but that never stopped anyone before. The result was a live action/CGI hybrid that was insane in staging and should have died on the vine. The critics ravaged it, but it became, at time of release, the 5th highest grossing film of the year, and Burton's most profitable. 

Disney noticed, and followed up on their actions. Cinderella was press-ganged into a remake, which was adequate, but unneeded. 

Yet again, the film hit the box office with thunderous success, and alongside it came the official mandate: Make More Of These!

Jungle Book was also successful, mainly due to Jon Farveau, known for Elf and the Iron Man films, reinforcing the idea that Disney had hit the jackpot.

Looking ahead, we can see several films, ranging from obscure to successful in initial release, lined up for conversion. Judge Doom has returned, throwing darts into artists' eyes, and pocketing the money for himself. Disney feels that animation is something that can be reheated in a microwave of live-action, then slapped on the market to sell like hotcakes. We've been here before. This thinking led to the making of several films with the same basic formula and recycled animation. 

Both in the 70's, and during Eisner's reign, recycled ideas were the norm. In both instances, the studio suffered .We've already had to bear this lesson twice before, and no one has learned anything, save how to disguise their money-grubbing ways. I implore animation fans to protest these films, and to show up in droves for the actual animated films. No one should pressure one art form out because of what is shiny and new. 

If Disney likes their old library of films, then why are they changing them? What do they have to be ashamed of? And why does their studio seem committed to such action, if it already has Star Wars and Marvel? If films like The Finest Hours are still making money, why do you need to change classics that were well received to begin with? Is it all about money now? Or is there one vein of creativity that you haven't bled dry, waiting for the next changing of the guard? Time's catching up to you, mad that you've wasted his gifts, and recycling old ideas won't stop him forever.

There's only two roads open to you now:
Either prove that there's still some glimmer of Walt's innovation inside the studio, or sacrifice it all for the bottom line. The choice is yours. I hope you know what to do. Because if you don't, Sony, Dreamworks, Universal, and Warner Bros. will be happy to take over.


Postscript: The live-action Alice sequel has failed. That said, there's still far too much chance of something backfiring with another live-action film for me to recant this message. 

To sum up: Beware of the road that others walk, time and again, while learning nothing, or you'll be trampled by the rush of mistakes that follows. In simpler terms, don't blindly follow the crowd. Show imagination when you make art. Take chances, make mistakes, and get messy!

Robin Hood - Disney Films Project

Moving along in our Disney Films Project list, we hit upon one of the bigger splits in our opinions. Most of the time, we are pretty close on our viewpoints, but this one definitely left us divided.

Robin Hood was one of my favorite Disney films while I was growing up. Granted, there weren't a lot of them back then to choose from, but I always loved the simple story and the way that animals were used to depict the tale of Robin Hood. I thought Prince John was somewhat funny and also laughed at Sir Hiss. I loved Maid Marian, Friar Tuck, and the buzzard guards were my favorite.

When I became a parent and showed Robin Hood to my children, I could never understand why they didn't really get into it. It wasn't one that they asked to watch over and over again. I never thought much about it until we came to do the review for this project. Alex was not pleased when it was time to watch this movie. I was surprised to hear his opinions and once he pointed out some of the flaws of the movie, it did change my viewpoint a bit. However, I still like this movie and I stand by that.

The animation isn't top notch and the story is simple, but I enjoy the characters. I also think the music is cute and does a good job of moving the story along. This one won't win any awards, but I give it 7 out of 10 Mickeys.

Second Opinion with Alex Nelson

Me and my maw. I said I liked all things England last review, and of course they serve up something problematic.

It’s not that the film lacks animation. In between the Xeroxed sequences, there’s innovation enough, I suppose. In fact, if there were better support, this could be a good film.

No, the problem lies in the story.

The title character, the ladies Marian and Kluck, Friar tuck, our Minstrel, and the Sherriff of Nottingham and his goons. That’s all the good characters out of the way, except for, well:

This marks Phil’s whopping THIRD time playing basically the same character. I guess the script formula requires our actor somewhere in the film.

The whole thing is formulaic, make no mistake. I wouldn’t be putting this so low if it weren’t for a real issue.

Children just being children actors is problematic, complete with a sequence written after the writers needed to put plot exposition somewhere in the film. (NOOO! We forgot the ROMANCE! Quick, write an explanation, anybody, we’ve got to hit our deadline!)

But the real issue lies with our opposition.

I already mentioned my distaste for comic villains in the napkin I wrote the Aristocats Review on. I’ll gladly expound on that. If a villain isn’t meant to be taken seriously, they at least need something threatening about them. Look at Kaa. Kaa isn’t much of a villain unless you’re on your own. Fortunately, his intentions are bad, and he knows where to avoid crossing the line.

Look at Captain Hook. He collapses in fear of the Croc? No worries, he’ll blow up your home, and go in for a sneak attack. Codfish, maybe, but when push comes to shove, he’s perfect form for evil.

Prince John and Sir Hiss couldn’t evil their way out of a paper bag. The snake is meh. Not enough cunning, and such a nag. He’s half prop most of the time, and considering the pedigree of his predecessor, Kaa, that’s not suprising, but he’s so- So foppish! He’s practically sniveling!

But our real culprit needs no intro. When you’ve got a villain with embarrassing habits, a villain the other characters routinely mock behind his back, and a villain who’s a wet fart in the bottle of noxious odors that is villainy? When you’ve got that, you SCREWED UP!


Am I dead? Is this my punishment for loving Britain so much in my earlier reviews? To observe this pretender to the throne? Whatever sin I’ve done, I take it back, just, please, make this idiot go back to his preschool or whatever he came from.

If it weren’t for the Sheriff, portrayed as a corrupt old west looter, I don’t think any of the villains would get passing grades. Props to the person who pulled that off. Not to mention he’s actually menacing, unlike our snake and lion.

All in all, the film Gets… 5/10 Mickey ears? Am I writing this right? The Film is Mediocre?

Yes, for no other reason than the perfect casting of our heroes, including the perfect charlatan for Robin Hood, and yes, even the overused Phil Harris.

So that leaves the royal rock pile. (Well, I feel like some punishment is due!) For imperfectly executed menace, a villain that ruins the name villain for all other villains in Disney including Pete, and a completely messed up sense of villain’s purpose, I condemn the writers for Prince John & Sir Hiss to a fate suitable for their treason: Acting as villains in Dora the Explorer. And so shall it be law.


Bedknobs and Broomsticks - Disney Films Project

 I love it when we hit one of my childhood favorites when we move through our Disney Films Project list. I've always enjoyed Bedknobs and Broomsticks and it was one of those films that touched my imagination as a child.

I secretly wanted a brass bed with removable knobs, and I certainly wanted to be able to control my own armor army! Although, in retrospect, I'm a little surprised that didn't scare me as a kid. It is sort of creepy, but the film makes it more funny than scary. I guess that's one of the things I like about this movie - it doesn't take itself too seriously. 

Angela Lansbury is a delight as the main character and I really like the children as well. I've always wondered why they cast the same man who played the father in Mary Poppins as Professor Brown in this one and I found that distracting in my youth and I still do. But it seems that was a time in the Disney period where actors were used and reused often. Oh well, it's a minor issue for me.

The animation during the traveling bed scenes is pretty strange and it seems like they could have done so much more with that. However, I have to give this film praise for the way they combined live action and animation together. It was quite groundbreaking at the time and it's still fun to watch. 

I enjoy the music and the overall story so I'm giving Bedknobs and Broomsticks 8 out of 10 Mickeys on our grading scale. 

Second Opinion with Alex Nelson

Many people write this film off as an inferior Poppins clone. But to be frank, the stories are like apples and oranges. It’s definitely the best inferior Poppins Clone I’ve ever watched!

The film’s beginning seems a bit confused, but this isn’t too bad later on. And while the practical effects seem rather problematic, the animation is excellent, and towards the end of the film, things clear up quite nicely.

I’ve actually got some writing in the offing regarding this film, which I will gladly share, provided credit is given. I’ll post it here sometime. Watch this space!

I love this film almost as much as Mary Poppins, but make no mistake, that’s not faint praise. In fact, this is one of the few films from this period that I can stand to watch, unlike my reviewer above. 

The 25th anniversary edition adds back some long lost content. While the extended cut of Portobello road is somewhat odd, I can support all of the other songs.

And as for the animation, I can find little fault with it, aside from the odd transitions. The story does have a slight plothole regarding the Star of Asteroth, but I’m going to invoke one of the old clichés regarding this stuff: A Wizard Did It.

Overall, this gets an 8/10 Mickeys. It’s somewhat lacking in effects, and a few segments are long, but it’s a great film, with stellar performances from the cast. Especially Mrs. Lansbury, who shows off her acting long before Murder, She Wrote. If you’re looking for a good film, this one won’t let you down.

The Aristocats - Disney Films Project

 We are now officially entering the time period in our Disney Films Project where we will be reviewing Disney movies that have been released in my (Katie's) lifetime. The Aristocats came out in 1970 when I was only 1 year old so this is a film that played in the theaters a few times during my growing up years. Disney doesn't do much to ever promote or showcase this movie in the parks or current culture. Perhaps it is a different story at Disneyland Paris? I do love our little Marie Tsum Tsum and I do wish they would release the other kittens to go with her.

Katie's thoughts

This is one of those movies that Alex and I disagree on. I grew up with the Aristocats and it was one of my very favorites. To be fair, we didn't have VHS or DVD and we could only see the films when they came out in the theater every 7 years. I saw it a few times during my childhood and I always loved it. It seemed like it took forever for Disney to actually release it on video once they started opening up the vault. 

Now, as an educated adult who has seen what the Disney studio is really capable of, I can see where this film is lacking. However, back in my day (boy, do I sound old!) it was a fun film for me. I loved the dogs that Edgar runs into and they still make me giggle. I also thought the English geese were hilarious. It's a simple story and there isn't much to it, but that's ok. When I was a kid, I would have given this 10 Mickeys. Now, I give it 6 out of 10 and that might be a little too generous, but I have to give nostalgia a nod here and pay homage to one of my early favorites.

Second opinion with Alex

You know how I had Lady and the Tramp pegged as “precious to the point of being forgettable”? The Aristocats makes it look like an action movie, and that is saying something.

The problem is inherent in the characters. Namely, Duchess’s kittens. You know how shows will throw young characters into a plot to appeal to new blood? This is basically the role of the kittens. They’re such a part of the focus of the film that it’s cloying. 

And of course, this neuters (get it?) any chance for Edgar to rise above “comic villain”. While the parts with him and the guard dogs are relatively funny, the whole is definitely not the sum of its parts. I don’t like comic villains unless they have some type of menace about them. I will talk about this more in the future. For now, just realize that we’ve taken several steps back in the quality of writing. What good is a villain who’s more of a running gag than a threat?

Phil Harris is the film’s saving grace, lending some of his gifted talent to Thomas O’Malley. This and his song with Scatman Crothers as Scat cat are excellent moments. But that’s all. Moments.

I found myself, in the opening of the film, uttering the eight words that can kill a film, “I don’t care what happens to these characters.” Don’t get me wrong, I still felt for their situation. But the presentation is so bland, it doesn’t give much to care for, not even when Duchess is giving info that should make us care for her plight. I just don’t feel anything regarding the film is up to Disney’s usual standards. In fact, without Phil Harris, the whole thing is pretty declawed. (It’s FUNNY! It’s okay to laugh!)

The Xerox process is beginning to show its age at this point. Characters appear pasted on backgrounds, gags are repeated to the point of tedium, and the whole thing seems lacking. 

Hurting matters is the lackluster songwriting. The title has Maurice Chevalier lapsing into French, which I mistook for a stroke, and the other songs, save “Everybody Wants to be a Cat” and “Thomas O’Malley” have issues. “Scales and Arpeggios” suffers from kid vocals, which I find annoying, and that’s… wait, there’s another song? True story, I thought that “She Never Felt Alone” was Eva Gabor speaking. You have to mess up pretty badly in delivery for that to happen.

And then there are the additional characters. Four band-playing cats, three English geese, two barnyard dogs, and an old human lawyer slapped in the film! The reason? Nothing more than an ill-advised  attempt to create humor. The dogs succeed, but everyone else just seems to drag the pacing down. There, but for the grace of Sterling Holloway, Phil Harris, and Scatman Crothers, goes the film.

There appears to be a formula here.

1: Talking animals
2: Kid hero
3: Diverse cast of side characters
4: Well-known actor in villain role
5: Phil Harris or someone who acts like him.
6: Reused animation
7: Something English
8: Jazz Number
9: Climactic battle with villain, resulting in villain being humiliated.
10: Leads pair up at end of film.

Overall I give this film 3 mickeys out of 10. A square in the act can send the whole thing back. Is it any wonder Miss Gabor wanted to add some comedy to her role? (THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENED.)

I'm the leader, I'll say when the review's out.

The review's out.

The Jungle Book - Disney Films Project

 Continuing on with our Disney Films Project, it's time for The Jungle Book!

Katie's thoughts

This is one of my childhood favorites and I still enjoy it as an adult. I never read Rudyard Kipling's books so I never worried about it being so unfaithful to the original works. I just have always loved the characters and the songs. King Louie and his crazy monkeys are scene stealers for sure and the song I wanna be like you -oooh -oooh, is so fun and catchy! Baloo's Bear Necessities is another classic. And that sweet little song the girl sings at the end gets me every time. Of course Mowgli has to go with her after that!

There's not anything too deep to examine here, just a cute story told with flair. The animation is pretty standard for Disney look of the time period it was released in, but that's a compliment. I'm giving it 9 out of 10 Mickeys but it's probably more like a 9.5 for me. 

Second opinion with Alex


Here we are, end of the classic age.

This is our 2nd finale, the last film Walt produced before his end. In that sense, the whole thing takes on one last resonance of familiar themes. 

Swinging jazz permeates the soundtrack, and a few noted celebrities are in roles, instead of just the rotating Disney ensemble. If this company were a band, it would be Chicago. The entire thing resonates with a varied song selection, memorable characters, and excellent art. What else to say?

This is a very good finale, and I give it 9/10. It's not faithful to the stories, by any means, but it adapts them well. The one caveat is some of the dialogue not flowing as well as usual. 

Poppins holdover: Trust in Me has been re-purposed from its original draft, "The Land of Sand." This was part of a compass sequence that was storyboarded, but not filmed.

Star Wars Episode 7 - The Force Awakens

We've been anxiously waiting for the right time to post our review of Star Wars: The Force Awakens. We decided to wait until the movie had been released on iTunes and DVD and give everyone about a month to see it before we wrote our post. It worked out perfectly because we watched it on May the 4th which has come to be known as Star Wars Day!


This is where we have to warn about spoilers and we are not kidding! We don't want to ruin it for anyone who hasn't seen the film. Even if you don't think you are a Star Wars fan or even if you haven't seen all the other movies, we think you will still enjoy this film. So quit reading if you haven't watched! 

I knew when I heard that J.J. Abrams was heading up this movie that it would be a good one. I was a big fan of LOST and even though I never really was much of a Trekkie, I like what he did with the Star Trek film series. I was also relieved that George Lucas wasn't involved in this movie. I feel bad saying that since it's his baby, but the prequels prove that he needed to let someone else take over the reigns. 

It was so much fun to watch all of the old movies and prepare for this new chapter. I was careful to not read anything online about it and I even stayed off of Facebook for a few days to protect myself from spoilers. As I was browsing through LEGO photos on Instagram, some jerk posted THE great big spoiler from the movie right there in his caption two days before the film even opened. I was so mad! Why do people have to ruin it like that? So lame!

With all that out of the way, I have to say that I completely enjoyed The Force Awakens. I guess time will tell how it all fits into the Star Wars universe, but I loved the characters (old and new) and it was filled with amazing action. The first trilogy from the 1970s was something special even without all the great technology of today. But it sure was fun to see a Star Wars story illustrated in the most dynamic way possible (so far)! Thankfully, the film didn't have to just rely on the effects. The plot and actors were great as well. And I can't stress this enough... Harrison Ford has still got it, even after all of these years!

I genuinely liked Rey and Finn and I hated Kylo Ren so I know the movie magic worked on me. I would have liked a little more of the older characters, but I also understand that they have to turn over the franchise to the younger folks. Han and Chewie are classics though and it felt so good to have them back for a time. I loved the small bits of humor woven into the film; Han snarking at Chewie "Oh, YOU'RE cold?" The Stormtroopers turning back down a hallway when they heard Kylo Ren throwing a fit in the other room, and Han telling the kids to "escape now, hug later." 

My only complaints? The Snoke character (image below) seems ripped off from Lord of the Rings or something. He seemed a bit out of place in the Star Wars world. And I'm a big Han Solo fan so you can imagine that I'm having a hard time accepting his fate. That one hurt! Even so, I give this movie high marks. I'm giving it 9 out of 10 stars. Well done!

Now on to Alex's review...

May Four Stars Be With Us: Episode VII: The Franchise Awakens.

So this is a newer film, and the spoiler warning still applies. I know I sound like a broken record, so basically, don’t read if you haven’t seen. Cool?

This film is really difficult to review on a continuity level, but we have a very good beginning set up in this episode. Given Abrams’ tendencies, that’s a good thing. (Why is the water in the temple brown, and how did it affect Sayid?)

The Character arcs for our protagonists are neatly written, and executed. Some people will complain about Rey being overly powerful, but don’t forget, she’s a novice at this stuff, and she’s not as aware of this type of thing as others.

Finn stands out, mainly because he’s terrified out of his gourd at the beginning, and grows into a more courageous individual as the film goes on. That’s the definition of heroism, right there. Being afraid and doing it anyway.

And Poe Dameron is an awesome pilot, and totally attractive, not to mention a genuinely likeable character. This is how one introduces the plotline, right here.

The whole thing boils down to It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World IN SPACE, but to be honest, that’s not a problem. Getting too complex was what bogged the prequels down, after all. And the simple plot allows for character establishment for the heroes and villains.

General Hux manages to sell the idea that a high ranking official in the First order can be intimidating and intelligent, something that even Grand Moff Tarkin struggled to accomplish.

The Stormtroopers have gained levels of skill as well, becoming accurate enough to hunt down many people, and in one instance, skilled enough to fight, and almost beat, a guy with a lightsaber!

But it’s Kylo Ren who manages to show the power of the dark side. He’s not trained as a sith, but he can freeze people and blaster bolts in place, and also read the minds of others! One wonders how such a person would turn out under full training.

Han Solo also turns out a good performance, but we don’t focus on him for long. He’s got a son, who he eventually confronts. This is Kylo Ren, AKA Ben Solo.

And I will be totally honest, the legacy characters aren’t utilized as much, mainly because they’re getting too old. But Han and Chewie are still good. Han even gets a touching moment with his son, where he manages to show a side of him we haven’t seen.

And then we see his death, because Kylo has just killed him with his lightsaber in an act of faked emotion. What a lowdown move! Rewatching this, my mom didn’t want to witness this action, it unnerved her. Finally, this generation gets its “I am your father” moment.

Cue epic lightsaber duel with Rey and Kylo. Oh, and this is taking place on a giant battle station, that’s basically the death star supercharged, in the middle of a dog fight to take the place down. I grew up on Star wars, and this still excited me! (~_~)

I can’t wait to see what happens next, but that’s later, and right now, we have to PREPARE TO WATCH ROGUE ONE, YOU GUYS! THERE’S ANOTHER MOVIE RELEASING DECEMBER THIS YEAR! Not going to lie, I am stoked!


The Force is Strong With:

  • BB-8. The character seemed shoehorned in during the marketing blitz, but they pulled him off correctly! Great job, Disney! Gold Medal!
  • The Starkiller Base Sequence is deftly choreographed, to the point that I counted off the time in movie for when the weapon would fire, and it was accurate to the point of being somewhat creepy. (Start timing when you hear “weapon charged in 15 minutes” and count how many times the dialogue in the film syncs up.)
  • Also, the piloting in this film sets a new standard for Star Wars piloting. Super sweet!
  • Rey is the type of role model we should be seeing in action films, and has an excellent backstory that makes her sympathetic. You kind of want to hug her after all she’s been through.
  • Finn is an even better character, and also incredible. The only issue he has in battle is being put up against even more skilled opponents. But it’s not for lack of trying. As for his character, how many of us can relate to what he’s going through?

If I listed more, we’d be here until December. Whatever’s not on Dark Side goes here.

The Dark Side Lurks Within:

  • Leia hugs Rey, a complete stranger, while Chewbacca is left to grieve Han’s death alone.
  • Phasma is wasted in her appearances, so I guess we’ll have to wait for episode 8 to see her in action.
  • Speaking of which, does Snoke do anything other than look menacing and holographic?
  • Per the Abrams formula, there are more questions than answers. We even get brushed off when someone explicitly asks how someone got Luke’s old lightsaber.
  • R2-D2 just seems to resume at complete random. It’s weird. You couldn’t have booted up before all the action happened?
  • New mercenaries that might be a threat to Han Solo are introduced, then killed in debut moment. What a waste of characters!
  • Leia isn’t leading the resistance as much as I’d like. And I know Carrie Fisher is old, but no mentions of other battles or anything?
  • Really vague ending. What is happening in that last scene?

The Jedi Says:

{Luke stares at you, battered by the elements of age. He has trained many, and watched many fall. In his eyes, there remains the faintest of light, surrounded by uncertainty. The look is one that has crossed your face as you’ve anticipated this movie. But you know him, and you know that light will overcome. You look upon the past leader, aged to maturity in the force, and you sense your own light returning.}


“As long as there’s a Comment Section, there’s hope!”